skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
ucla law
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Quota for forward castes
The ongoing hearing in Dr.K.Krishna Murthy case at the Supreme Court yesterday brought to the fore Karnataka Government's defence of quota for forward castes. This
story
gives a gist of the State Government's defence, as well as the background.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Search
menu
►
2012
(63)
►
February
(20)
►
January
(43)
►
2011
(449)
►
December
(40)
►
November
(38)
►
October
(39)
►
September
(38)
►
August
(46)
►
July
(49)
►
June
(47)
►
May
(41)
►
April
(35)
►
March
(27)
►
February
(38)
►
January
(11)
►
2009
(280)
►
August
(35)
►
July
(26)
►
June
(24)
►
May
(41)
►
April
(38)
►
March
(27)
►
February
(46)
►
January
(43)
▼
2008
(335)
►
December
(50)
▼
November
(41)
The making of a terrorist
The Mumbai Bombing: An Eyewitness Account
24/7 news and 'No time to Think'
Nilekani's sobering analysis of the Mumbai attacks
Secularism: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
Reservation and empowerment: A debate on K.Krishna...
Mumbai Mayhem: Search for an effective counter-ter...
The Indian Journal of Constitutional Law - New Issue
Justice Katju's Piece in the Hindu
Constitutional Significance of a Classical Language
Dr.Rajeev Dhavan's submissions in the K.Krishna Mu...
Another Review of "Reserved"
An Unnecessary Amendment
Courting Social Justice: Excerpts from a new book ...
On torture
Constitutional Right to Nature
Association for Democratic Reforms & Election Watch
Judicial Activism, PILs and all that jazz
Article 377: Philosophy Behind the Law
Reforming Public Interest Litigation
Significance of Supreme Court's architecture
OCCASIONAL DIGEST
PIL jurisprudence: Change in Supreme Court's approach
Obama's success: Lessons for India
Do we need a law tougher than POTA?
Halsbury's Law on Judicial Reforms
Architecture and the majesty of a democratic state
MHA's advice to the President on GUJCOCA
Quota for forward castes
Lawyers' absenteeism in courts
Government defends exclusion of creamy layer
Courting Destiny
Supreme Court's arrears: A new perspective
Vicarious liability for political violence
Cut-Off Marks in School Admissions: Was Judicial I...
Rationale of reservations in local bodies
OCCASIONAL DIGEST
Today at the Supreme Court
Many Facets of Judicial Review
Freshman History (link via NYT)
GUJCOCA and Article 254
►
October
(20)
►
September
(18)
►
August
(28)
►
July
(19)
►
June
(22)
►
May
(25)
►
April
(31)
►
March
(24)
►
February
(22)
►
January
(35)
►
2007
(240)
►
December
(20)
►
November
(18)
►
October
(17)
►
September
(25)
►
August
(21)
►
July
(26)
►
June
(26)
►
May
(20)
►
April
(32)
►
March
(24)
►
February
(11)
►
2006
(13)
►
November
(1)
►
June
(5)
►
March
(3)
►
February
(4)
►
2005
(48)
►
November
(14)
►
October
(20)
►
September
(10)
►
August
(4)
No comments:
Post a Comment