skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
ucla law
Tuesday, November 29, 2005
Justice Kurup Responds
Now, Justice Kurup gives
his
version of who actually is responsible for the Kerala Smoking judgment. This episode strikes me as bizarre and quite contrary to our judiciary's rather collegial behaviour.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Search
menu
►
2012
(63)
►
February
(20)
►
January
(43)
►
2011
(449)
►
December
(40)
►
November
(38)
►
October
(39)
►
September
(38)
►
August
(46)
►
July
(49)
►
June
(47)
►
May
(41)
►
April
(35)
►
March
(27)
►
February
(38)
►
January
(11)
►
2009
(280)
►
August
(35)
►
July
(26)
►
June
(24)
►
May
(41)
►
April
(38)
►
March
(27)
►
February
(46)
►
January
(43)
►
2008
(335)
►
December
(50)
►
November
(41)
►
October
(20)
►
September
(18)
►
August
(28)
►
July
(19)
►
June
(22)
►
May
(25)
►
April
(31)
►
March
(24)
►
February
(22)
►
January
(35)
►
2007
(240)
►
December
(20)
►
November
(18)
►
October
(17)
►
September
(25)
►
August
(21)
►
July
(26)
►
June
(26)
►
May
(20)
►
April
(32)
►
March
(24)
►
February
(11)
►
2006
(13)
►
November
(1)
►
June
(5)
►
March
(3)
►
February
(4)
▼
2005
(48)
▼
November
(14)
Justice Kurup Responds
Biogas, Animal Husbandry or a Secular Republic
Justice Lakshman and the Smoking Judgment
Marital Rape held a criminal offence in Mexico: Im...
Rajeev Dhavan on the Constitutional Crisis in Nepa...
Stimulating interview on contemporary Indian envir...
A potential national debate over the separation of...
The Faculty Blog of the University of Chicago Law ...
Progressive changes in Hindu family law: Towards a...
NEW AGE “INDIAN(A) JONES"?: REGULATING BIOPROSPECT...
Contrasting perspectives on dealing with terrorism
Socialism and Our Constitution
Parting salvo: An endorsement of the US’s “War on ...
THE ASIAN GIANTS AS “WORLD SUPERPOWERS”: A NOTE OF...
►
October
(20)
►
September
(10)
►
August
(4)
No comments:
Post a Comment